Zhao v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Tao Zhao
Defendant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Richard Valeika
Case Number: 3:2024cv01145
Filed: February 26, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Maxine M Chesney
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tao Zhao (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 3/5/2024)
March 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT COURTESY COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 5, 2024. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2024)
February 27, 2024 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Richard Valeika, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2024)
February 27, 2024 Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2024)
February 26, 2024 Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2024)
February 26, 2024 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Tao Zhao (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 2/26/2024)
February 26, 2024 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 2/26/2024)
February 26, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Richard Valeika ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19158506.). Filed by Tao Zhao. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wang, Justin) (Filed on 2/26/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zhao v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tao Zhao
Represented By: Justin X. Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Valeika
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?