Villalobos v. Monsanto Company, Inc et al
| Addon Urra Villalobos |
| Monsanto Company, Inc. and Bayer Corporation |
| 3:2024cv01407 |
| March 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Case transferred in from District of Florida Middle; Case Number 2:24-cv-00158. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: Middle District of Florida, 2:24-cv-00158, Villalobos v. Monsanto Company, Inc et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-01407 VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 446 cc: JPMDL (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2024) |
| Filing 14 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel order transferring case to: Northern District of California. MDL case number: 2741. (SMG) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE canceling Preliminary Pretrial Conference hearing scheduled for 4/8/24. (CGW) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Bayer Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Bayer AG for Bayer Corporation.. (Vrasmasu, Mihai) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company, Inc identifying Corporate Parent Bayer AG for Monsanto Company, Inc.. (Vrasmasu, Mihai) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Bill B. Berke on behalf of Addon Urra Villalobos. Lead Counsel: Bill B. Berke. (Berke, Bill) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Mihai M. Vrasmasu on behalf of Bayer Corporation, Monsanto Company, Inc. Lead Counsel: Mihai M. Vrasmasu. (Vrasmasu, Mihai) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2024 at 10:00 AM via Zoom Video Conference before Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. Case Management Report due by 4/1/2024. Zoom instructions will be sent via separate email to counsel of record. (CGW) |
| Filing 7 CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/22/2024. (CGW) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LSS) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Bayer Corporation.(Vrasmasu, Mihai) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Monsanto Company, Inc.(Vrasmasu, Mihai) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek. New case number: 2:24-cv-00158-SPC-KCD. (TRF) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Bayer Corporation, Monsanto Company, Inc with Jury Demand filed by Addon Urra Villalobos. (Filed in state court on 1/30/24).(LSS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 20th Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida, case number 2024-CA-000211 filed in State Court on 01/30/2024. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-21785307 filed by Monsanto Company, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Exhibit A, #2 State Court Docket Sheet Exhibit B, #3 State Court Other Documents Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Consent to Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vrasmasu, Mihai) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
