DePonte v. Stohl et al
David Arthur DePonte |
Stohl, Stern, J. Saucedo, K. Sudano, M. Dobe and Gunsaga |
3:2024cv01416 |
March 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Lisa J Cisneros |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 4/15/2024. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Arthur DePonte, CDCR # T-43638.The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, reflecting the last six months activity, to cdcrfilings@cand.uscourts.gov. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2024) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M. Dobe, Gunsaga, J. Saucedo, Stern, Stohl, K. Sudano. Filed by David Arthur DePonte. Consent/Declination due by 4/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2024) |
Changed plaintiff's mailing address from CSATF's physical address to the post office box for Facility G. (ljf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.