Infineon Technologies Austria AG v. Innoscience (Suzhou) Technology Company, Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Infineon Technologies Austria AG
Defendant: Innoscience (Suzhou) Technology Company, Ltd., Innoscience (Zhuhai) Technology Company, Ltd. and Innoscience America, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2024cv01553
Filed: March 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2024 Filing 14 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Jie Xiang ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-19218855.) filed by Infineon Technologies Austria AG. (Xiang, Jie) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 13 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Eric J. Rutt ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-19218834.) filed by Infineon Technologies Austria AG. (Rutt, Eric) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Innoscience (Suzhou) Technology Company, Ltd., Innoscience (Zhuhai) Technology Company, Ltd., Innoscience America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Gregory F. Corbett ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-19218808.) filed by Infineon Technologies Austria AG. (Corbett, Gregory) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Charles T. Steenburg ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-19218781.) filed by Infineon Technologies Austria AG. (Steenburg, Charles) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Elizabeth A. DiMarco ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-19218687.) filed by Infineon Technologies Austria AG. (DiMarco, Elizabeth) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 8 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding (cc: form mailed to register). (Boyd, Karen) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Infineon Technologies Austria AG identifying Corporate Parent Infineon Technologies AG, Other Affiliate Infineon Technologies Holding B.V. for Infineon Technologies Austria AG. (Boyd, Karen) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Boyd, Karen) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Boyd, Karen) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Boyd, Karen) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/10/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/17/2024 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/27/2024. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19218570.). Filed by Infineon Technologies Austria AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyd, Karen) (Filed on 3/13/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Infineon Technologies Austria AG v. Innoscience (Suzhou) Technology Company, Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Infineon Technologies Austria AG
Represented By: Eric J. Rutt
Represented By: Jie Xiang
Represented By: Karen I. Boyd
Represented By: Charles T. Steenburg
Represented By: Elizabeth A DiMarco
Represented By: Gregory Corbett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Innoscience (Suzhou) Technology Company, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Innoscience (Zhuhai) Technology Company, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Innoscience America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?