M.Y. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
M.Y. |
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC |
3:2024cv01821 |
March 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by M.Y. re #1 Complaint (Luhana, Roopal) (Filed on 3/25/2024) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Luhana, Roopal) (Filed on 3/25/2024) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT M.Y. against Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19254338.). Filed by M.Y.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Luhana, Roopal) (Filed on 3/25/2024) |
***PLEASE DISREGARD*** # Other Filings > Notices > Notice of Additional Parties.. Re: #1 Complaint filed by M.Y. (wsm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2024) Modified on 3/25/2024 (wsm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/25/2024 (wsm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/25/2024 (wsm, COURT STAFF). |
#Electronic filing error. Not all parties listed in the complaint have been added to the docket. Please add the missing parties using the event Notice of Additional Parties. The event can be found at: Civil Events > Other Filings > Notices > Notice of Additional Parties. Re: #1 Complaint filed by M.Y. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.