Smith v. Superior Court of California County of Alameda et al
| Andrea Smith |
| Superior Court of California County of Alameda, People of the State of California, Judge Stuart Hing and Attorney Ronald D. Smetana |
| 3:2024cv01981 |
| April 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Peter H Kang |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/4/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/11/2024 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Andrea Smith. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against Stuart Hing, People of the State of California, Ronald D. Smetana, Superior Court of California County of Alameda. Filed by Andrea Smith. Consent/Declination due by 4/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
