Anderson v. Lichtblau et al
| Diana V. Anderson |
| Elisabeth Soloway, Sheila Shah Lichtblau, Lisa Soloway, Mercy Hall, David R. Hermelin, Eugene T. Anderson and Brenda E. Anderson Lanoue |
| 3:2024cv02033 |
| April 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Alex G Tse |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/28/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/5/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - To be held by Zoom. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Diana V. Anderson. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2024) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eugene T. Anderson, Brenda E. Anderson Lanoue, Mercy Hall, David R. Hermelin, Sheila Shah Lichtblau, Elisabeth Soloway. (No process, IFP pending) Filed by Diana V. Anderson. Consent/Declination due by 4/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
