R.C. et al v. Sussex Publishers, LLC
| R.C. and D.G. |
| Sussex Publishers, LLC |
| 3:2024cv02609 |
| May 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE PROVIDING ZOOM ACCESS INFORMATION. The Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/1/2024 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley will be held by a Zoom webinar. Joint statement is due by 7/25/2024.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at JSCcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 7/31/2024.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2024) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 7/25/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/1/2024 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2024) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error. Filer is reminded to enter the state court information in the case opening screen. The Origin Code has also been corrected to 2 - Removal from State Court. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Sussex Publishers, LLC. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2024) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Sussex Publishers, LLC (Pearson, Matthew) (Filed on 5/1/2024) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT from Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. Their case number is 23CV057114. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ACANDC-19375528). Filed by Sussex Publishers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 copy of Complaint attached - Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pearson, Matthew) (Filed on 5/1/2024) Modified on 5/2/2024 (mcl, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
