Hernandez et al v. The Pierino Holding Company et al
| Rony Hernandez and Hector Perez |
| The Pierino Holding Company and Saurabh Dwivedi |
| 3:2024cv02697 |
| May 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Martin Penhallegon (Penhallegon, Ryan) (Filed on 7/1/2024) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Tatiana Delogramatic (Delogramatic, Tatiana) (Filed on 7/1/2024) |
| Filing 16 Certificate of Interested Entities by Saurabh Dwivedi, The Pierino Holding Company (Ford, Jaclyn) (Filed on 7/1/2024) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand, and COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Saurabh Dwivedi, The Pierino Holding Company. (Ford, Jaclyn) (Filed on 7/1/2024) Modified on 7/2/2024 (kmg, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION-Continuing Responsive Pleading Deadline re #1 Complaint, #6 Summons Returned Executed, filed by Saurabh Dwivedi, The Pierino Holding Company. (Ford, Jaclyn) (Filed on 6/6/2024) |
Filing 13
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/8/2024 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 8/1/2024. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/21/2024. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2024)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(smc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2024)
|
| Filing 11 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #https://cand.uscourts.gov/notices/northern-district-extends-caseload-rebalancing-pilot-program/. (smc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2024) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2024) |
| Filing 9 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options as to Hector Perez (Margain, Tomas) (Filed on 5/20/2024) |
| Filing 8 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options as to Rony Hernandez (Margain, Tomas) (Filed on 5/20/2024) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Rony Hernandez, Hector Perez.. (Margain, Tomas) (Filed on 5/20/2024) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rony Hernandez, Hector Perez. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service as to Dwivedi, Saurabh, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service as to The Pierino Holding Company)(Margain, Tomas) (Filed on 5/20/2024) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Saurabh Dwivedi, The Pierino Holding Company. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2024) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 7/30/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/6/2024 09:30 AM in San Jose, - Videoconference Only. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2024) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/21/2024. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2024) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Margain, Tomas) (Filed on 5/6/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19388412.). Filed by Rony Hernandez, Hector Perez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Margain, Tomas) (Filed on 5/6/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
