Hosseinyoun v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
| Tanya Hosseinyoun |
| Eli Lilly and Company, Jill Scott and Brett Roberts |
| 3:2024cv02809 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Eli Lilly and Company re #4 Certificate of Service [AMENDED] (Lee, Kevin) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/2/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/9/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/24/2024. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Eli Lilly and Company re #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, Notice of Appearance of Counsel (Sahouria, Janelle) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Eli Lilly and Company (Sahouria, Janelle) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Eli Lilly and Company (Sahouria, Janelle) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco County Superior. Their case number is CGC-24-613809. Copy of Complaint and Answer attached. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ACANDC-19403587). Filed by Eli Lilly and Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration)(Sahouria, Janelle) (Filed on 5/10/2024) Modified on 5/10/2024 (mcl, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. The following errors have been corrected on the case opening screen : (1) The Origin Code is corrected to '2 - Removal from State Court'. (2) The County Code is corrected to 'Marin' and not San Francisco as it refers to plaintiff's county of residence. (3) The party type for Tanya Hosseinyoun is plaintiff, not defendant. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Eli Lilly and Company. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error. Attorney Camron Dowlatshahi has been entered on the docket but the docket shows that the attorney is with the law firm of Loeb & Loeb LLP. Attorney Camron Dowlatshahi needs to update the ECF account as soon as possible. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Eli Lilly and Company. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
