Davion Louis v. TPG Funding, LLC
| Davion Louis |
| TPG Funding, LLC, 1-25 Does and TPG Inc. |
| 3:2024cv03011 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/12/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/19/2024, 01:30 PM in San Francisco - via Zoom. (kmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2024) |
| Filing 21 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 2:24-cv-01941. Case file, copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 20
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA #17 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. After reviewing Plaintiff's response, and based on Plaintiffs representation that both parties believe this action should be transferred to the Northern District of California and so consent, the court TRANSFERS this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to TPG Funding, LLC answer now due 5/30/2024; TPG Inc. answer now due 5/30/2024, re Amended Complaint/Petition #12 filed by Plaintiff Davion Louis.(Williams, Corbett) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Davion Louisto Order to Show Cause,, #17 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Plaintiff Davion Louis, #2 Declaration of Corbett H. Williams)(Williams, Corbett) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Plaintiff does not plead any facts to establish that this district has any connection to the claims pleaded. See FAC. Accordingly, the court ORDERS the parties to Show Cause in writing by April 23, 2024, why this action should not be transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) to the Northern District of California, the District of New Jersey, the District of Delaware, or the Northern District of Texas. (lc)
|
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #12 as to defendant TPG Inc. (lc) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #12 filed by Plaintiff Davion Louis. (Williams, Corbett) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #13 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. 1) Case number Missing. Official case number is to read as: 2:24cv01941 FLA (Ex). 2) Please indicate on the summons form near the title "ON THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT" as to correspond to that initiating document accordingly. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #12 filed by Plaintiff Davion Louis. (Williams, Corbett) |
| Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants DOES, TPG Funding, LLC, TPG Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Davion Louis(Williams, Corbett) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Davion Louisto Order to Show Cause,,, #10 regarding basis for diversity jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Plaintiff in response to Order to Show Cause)(Williams, Corbett) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The parties are ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The parties are encouraged to submit evidence and/or judicially noticeable facts in response to the court's Order. Responses shall be limited to ten (10) pages in length. The parties should consider this Order to be a two-pronged inquiry into the facial and factual sufficiency of Plaintiff's demonstration of jurisdiction. As Plaintiff is the party asserting federal jurisdiction, Plaintiff's failure to respond timely and adequately to this Order shall result in dismissal of the action without further notice. (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (dbe)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant TPG Funding, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Davion Louis. (Williams, Corbett) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Davion Louis. (Williams, Corbett) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Davion Louis, (Williams, Corbett) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37067752 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Davion Louis. (Attorney Corbett H Williams added to party Davion Louis(pty:pla))(Williams, Corbett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
