Korytko et al v. Monsanto Co. et al
| Mark Korytko and Ia Dac Korytko |
| Monsanto Co and 1-50 Does |
| 3:2024cv03052 |
| May 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Case Transferred in from U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York (Buffalo); Case Number 1:24-cv-00428-LJV. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED re MDL No. 2741: U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York (Buffalo), 1:24-cv-00428-LJV, Korytko, et al v. Monsanto Co., et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-03052-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-460) cc: JPMDL (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2024) |
| Filing 4 MULTIDISTRICT CONDITIONAL LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER transferring the action to the Northern District of California. Signed by Tiffaney D. Pete, Clerk of the Panel on 5/20/2024. (CGJ) |
| Filing 3 ATTENTION ALL PARTIES OR INTERVENORS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and/or General Order No. 157 In the Matter of Disclosure of Members, Shareholders, Partners, and Leaders of Business Organization Parties, all Disclosure Statements are to be filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (KM) |
| Notified Multi-District Litigation Panel of potential tag-along case. (TMK) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at #http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TMK) |
| Case Assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) |
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's #ADR webpage and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at #adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov.' Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the #ADR Plan and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Ia Dac Korytko, Mark Korytko. Monsanto Co. waiver sent on 5/3/2024, answer due 7/2/2024. (Feroleto, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does, Monsanto Co. $ 405 receipt number ANYWDC-5172965, filed by Ia Dac Korytko, Mark Korytko. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Feroleto, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
