Hernandez v. Belmont 76 Service Inc. et al
Gerardo Hernandez |
Diana M. Batshon and Belmont 76 Service Inc. |
3:2024cv04545 |
July 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Sallie Kim |
American with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/12/2024. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2024) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 7/26/2024) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19665323.). Filed by Gerardo Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 7/26/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.