WHB 359 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: WHB 359
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Case Number: 3:2024cv05610
Filed: August 21, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WHB 359. All Defendants. (Baskin, Batami) (Filed on 9/20/2024)
August 23, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2024)
August 23, 2024 DIRECT FILED MEMBER CASE OPENED: re: 3:23-md-3084-CRB, WHB 359 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-05610-CRB pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order cc: JPMDL (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2024)
August 21, 2024 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Abramson, Brian) (Filed on 8/21/2024)
August 21, 2024 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by WHB 359 (Abramson, Brian) (Filed on 8/21/2024)
August 21, 2024 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2024)
August 21, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19753405.). Filed by WHB 359. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baskin, Batami) (Filed on 8/21/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHB 359 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rasier, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rasier-CA, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WHB 359
Represented By: Brian Alan Abramson
Represented By: Walter E. Cubberly
Represented By: Myles Shaw
Represented By: Margret Lecocke
Represented By: John Eddie Williams, Jr
Represented By: Batami Elaine Baskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?