Roe CL 42 v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
Plaintiff: Jane Roe CL 42
Defendant: Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc and Rasier CA, LLC
Case Number: 3:2024cv05740
Filed: August 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rasier CA, LLC, Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2024)
August 26, 2024 DIRECT FILED MEMBER CASE OPENED: re: 23-md-03084-CRB, Jane Roe CL 42 v. Uber Technologies Inc et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-05740-CRB pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order cc: JPMDL (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2024)
August 23, 2024 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2024)
August 22, 2024 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Cutter, Curtis) (Filed on 8/22/2024)
August 22, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19760632.). Filed by Jane Roe CL 42. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cutter, Curtis) (Filed on 8/22/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roe CL 42 v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rasier LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rasier CA, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Roe CL 42
Represented By: Jennifer S Domer
Represented By: Celine Emily Cutter
Represented By: Curtis Brooks Cutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?