Macaulay v. City and County of San Francisco
| Ian Macaulay |
| City and County of San Francisco |
| 4:2024cv06931 |
| October 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference via a Zoom webinar has been set for January 7, 2025, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by December 31st. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:24-cv-06931-HSG. All attorneys and pro se litigants appearing for the case management conference are required to join at least 15 minutes before the hearing to check-in with the CRD. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/hsg General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2024) |
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 11/26/2024. (exl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2024)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2024) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ian Macaulay.. (Itkin, Arkady) (Filed on 11/25/2024) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 12/6/2024. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2024) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/27/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/3/2025 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2024) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/18/2024. (kxo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error.NOTICE OF NON-PAYMENT Please be advised that the filing fee has not been received in this case. The fee must be paid within two business days or the case will be subject to termination. Re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by City and County of San Francisco (kxo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2024) ***EFE Entered before fee was posted*** |
| Filing 2 FEE PAID (Filing fee$ 405.00, Receipt No. 311170475). (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2024) (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| #1 Pages 20-26 Answer to Removal Complaint by City and County of San Francisco. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2024) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (with jury demand) from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-24-617613. Filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wood, Lauren) (Filed on 10/3/2024) Modified on 10/4/2024 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Macaulay v. City and County of San Francisco | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ian Macaulay | |
| Represented By: | Arkady Igor Itkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City and County of San Francisco | |
| Represented By: | Lauren Elizabeth Wood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
