Carboc v. Jaddou et al
Plaintiff: Edwin Fernando Carboc
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou and USCIS
Case Number: 3:2024cv06950
Filed: October 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2024 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Edwin Fernando Carboc.. (Arena, Jessica) (Filed on 10/18/2024)
October 16, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edwin Fernando Carboc. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - USPS Electronic Return Receipt for the US Attorney's Office, #2 Exhibit B - USPS Electronic Return Receipt for the Attorney General, #3 Exhibit C - USPS Electronic Return Receipt for Ur Jaddou and USCIS)(Arena, Jessica) (Filed on 10/16/2024)
October 4, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, USCIS. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2024)
October 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER for Immigration Mandamus Case. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2024)
October 4, 2024 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/18/2024. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2024)
October 4, 2024 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Arena, Jessica) (Filed on 10/4/2024)
October 4, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT UNDER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT AND COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants, (Filing Fee: $405.00, receipt number ACANDC-19920226). Filed by Edwin Fernando Carboc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Form I-589 Receipt Notice, #2 Exhibit B - Form I-589 Interview Notice, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Arena, Jessica) (Filed on 10/4/2024) Modified on 10/4/2024 (tn, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carboc v. Jaddou et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edwin Fernando Carboc
Represented By: Jessica T. Arena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USCIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?