Denahan v. Monsanto Company
Leann Denahan |
Monsanto Company |
3:2024cv06956 |
October 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Missouri Eastern; Case Number 4:24-cv-01237. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: Denahan v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-06956-VC cc: JPMDL (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2024) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF MDL TRANSFER to: Northern District of California. Case transferred via CM/ECF extraction. Signed by Marcella R. Lockert on 9/30/24. (JWD) Modified on 9/30/2024 to correct name of Acting Clerk of MDL Panel (JWD). |
Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-481) regarding MDL 2741 by Clerk of the Panel. Signed by Marcella R. Lockert on 9/30/2024. (JBH) |
Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (auto) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Leann Denahan. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Haynie, David) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Leann Denahan Process Server: Lucas Ackermann (Haynie, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Monsanto Company with receipt number AMOEDC-10818592, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Leann Denahan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons)(Haynie, David) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney David Haynie. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Denahan v. Monsanto Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Leann Denahan | |
Represented By: | David Matthew Haynie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.