Lawson v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
| Omega Lawson |
| Porsche Cars North America, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv07136 |
| October 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT COURTESY COPIES OF DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 22, 2024. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2024)
|
|
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/7/2025 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor.Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/31/2025. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/22/2024. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2024)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 10/21/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2024)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2024) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Porsche Cars North America, Inc... (Cowden, Nathaniel) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
| Filing 6 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Cowden, Nathaniel) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Porsche Cars North America, Inc.. (Cowden, Nathaniel) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/8/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/15/2025 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2024) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/29/2024. (kam2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2024) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Porsche Cars North America, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Porsche Enterprises Incorporated, Other Affiliate Volkswagen AG, Other Affiliate Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG, Other Affiliate Porsche Nordamerika Holding GmbH, Other Affiliate PPF Holding AG, Other Affiliate Porsche Holding Stuttgart GmbH for Porsche Cars North America, Inc.. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) (Filed on 10/11/2024) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is 24CV091015. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ACANDC-19946655). Filed by Porsche Cars North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Contract, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) (Filed on 10/11/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lawson v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Omega Lawson | |
| Represented By: | David Trastamad Derderian |
| Represented By: | Armig K Khodanian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Porsche Cars North America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Soheyl Tahsildoost |
| Represented By: | Nathaniel Russell Cowden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
