C. v. Blue Cross of California dba Anthem Blue Cross
| Andrea C. |
| Blue Cross of California dba Anthem Blue Cross |
| 3:2024cv07268 |
| October 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/20/2025. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/27/2025 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/1/2024. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Spielman, Katie) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Spielman, Katie) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number BCANDC-19964917.). Filed by Andrea C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lilienstein, David) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error. Parties added to action incorrectly. Counsel is reminded not to add parties in all caps. For future reference, please refer to https://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening. See Guide to E-Filing New Civil Cases (Section III.c Adding Parties). Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Andrea C. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error. Submit one proposed summons listing all defendants. Attach additional pages if needed.This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #2 Proposed Summons filed by Andrea C., #3 Proposed Summons filed by Andrea C. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: C. v. Blue Cross of California dba Anthem Blue Cross | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Blue Cross of California dba Anthem Blue Cross | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrea C. | |
| Represented By: | David M. Lilienstein |
| Represented By: | Katie Joy Spielman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
