Sivak et al v. Smith et al
Mary M. Schroeder and Lacey Mark Sivak |
Andrew D. Hurwitz and Milan D. Smith, Jr. |
3:2024cv07465 |
October 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
PSLC GRC |
Araceli Martinez-Olguin |
Mandamus & Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on 12/26/2024. (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 ORDER DISMISSING MULTIPLE CASES WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on 12/26/2024. (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 12/5/2024. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Compel filed by Lacey Mark Sivak. Responses due by 11/25/2024. Replies due by 12/9/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.