Doe v. Heard et al
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Deputy Heard, Deputy Bravo, Deputy Mendoza and County of Alameda
Case Number: 3:2026cv07607
Filed: July 22, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2026 Filing 11 Plaintiff's Emergency MOTION to Stay re #7 Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11,, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by John Doe. Responses due by 9/29/2026. Replies due by 10/13/2026. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2026)
August 31, 2026 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 9/14/2026. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2026) (Mailed to pro se 8/31/2026) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
August 27, 2026 Filing 12 Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2026)
August 27, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by John Doe. Appeal of Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11,, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 (Appeal fee FEE NOT PAID.) (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2026)
July 29, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2026) Mailed to Plaintiff via USPS by CRD Modified on 7/29/2026 (tl, COURT STAFF). Modified on 8/26/2026 (bxl, COURT STAFF). (Main Document 8 replaced on 8/26/2026) (bxl, COURT STAFF).
July 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Sallie Kim. Denying #2 Administrative Motion To Proceed Anonymously; granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2026)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
July 22, 2026 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/19/2026. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/26/2026 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (bjw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2026)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
July 22, 2026 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (bjw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2026)
July 22, 2026 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John Doe. (bjw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2026)
July 22, 2026 Filing 3 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Sealed Complaint, #4 Envelope)(bjw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2026) (Attachment 4 replaced on 8/26/2026) (bxl, COURT STAFF). (Attachment 3 replaced on 8/26/2026) (bxl, COURT STAFF). (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/26/2026) (bxl, COURT STAFF). (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/26/2026) (bxl, COURT STAFF). (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/26/2026) (bxl, COURT STAFF).
July 22, 2026 Filing 2 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to proceed under a Pseudonym. filed by John Doe. Responses due by 7/27/2026. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(bjw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2026)
July 22, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bravo, County of Alameda, Heard, Mendoza. Filed by John Doe. Consent/Declination due by 8/5/2026. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bjw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2026) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/23/2026: #2 Envelope) (bjw, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Heard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Heard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Bravo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Mendoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Alameda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?