Case name not on file
| Black Arrow Strategies LLC |
| Catalyst Family Inc |
| 3:2026cv10708 |
| September 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3731 Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Catalyst Family Inc ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22487545.). Filed by Black Arrow Strategies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cutter, Curtis) (Filed on 9/18/2026) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Black Arrow Strategies LLC | |
| Represented By: | Curtis Brooks Cutter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Catalyst Family Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
