Branner v. Ayers, et al
Willie Branner |
Robert L. Ayers |
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center |
4:1990cv03219 |
November 9, 1990 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
D. Lowell Jensen |
Death Penalty |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 385 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Donato on 12/21/2023. (jdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2023) |
Filing 356 ORDER by Judge D. Lowell Jensen Granting 355 Motion for Second Enlargement of Time Relating to Petitioner's Brief Addressing Exceptions to Procedural Default for First Group of Defaulted Claims. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2014) |
Filing 350 AMENDED ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondent's Motion to Reconsider Findings on Procedural Default. Signed by Judge D. Lowell Jensen on 2/13/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2014) |
Filing 347 ORDER Denying Respondent's Updated Motion to Dismiss Claims Based on Statute of Limitations. Signed by Judge D. Lowell Jensen on 1/14/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2014) |
Filing 346 ORDER by Judge D. Lowell Jensen Granting in Part and Denying in Part 329 Motion to Reconsider Findings on Procedural Default. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2014) |
Filing 331 ORDER by Judge D. Lowell Jensen granting 330 Petitioner's Ex parte Application/Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Relating to Opposition to Respondent's 329 MOTION TO RECONSIDER FINDINGS ON PROCEDURAL DEFAULT. Time enlar ged by 45 days. Petitioner to file and serve Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Reconsider Findings on Procedural Default by 9/8/2011. Respondent shall file and serve his Reply brief in Support of Respondent's Motion to Dismss 30 days thereafter, on or before 10/10/2011. Court shall set a hearing date if necessary. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011) |
Filing 327 ORDER granting Respondent's Motion for Leave to Move for Reconsideration of Order re Adequacy of State Procedural Bars re 326 . Respondent shall file his motion within 45 days of the date of this Order. Petitioner shall file an opposition within 45 days of the date of service of respondent's brief. Respondent shall file a reply within 30 days of serve of petitioner's brief. Signed by Judge D. Lowell Jensen on 5/26/2011. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011) |
Filing 275 ORDER by Judge D. Lowell Jensen granting 274 Respondent's Ex Parte Application/Motion for Extension of Time to File an updated Motion to Dismiss based on the AEDPA Statute of Limitations. Time enlarged by 60 days. Respondent has to 10/28/08 to file and serve Updated Motion. Petitioner's opposition filed within 45 days of date of service of motion. Respondent's reply filed within 30 days of date of service of opposition. Court shall set a hearing date if necessary. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.