Distributors Association Warehousemen's Pension Trust et al v. Foreign Trade Zone 3, Inc.

Case Number: 4:2005cv01161
Filed: March 21, 2005
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 9, 2009 74 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: Finding Defendant Foreign Trade Zone 3, Inc. in civil contempt for violating Court's Order of 12/21/05; Defendant to make immediate payment in the amount of $50,717.56; Defendant to reimburse attorney's fees and costs in the amo unt of $17,052.00; A Writ of Attachment is issued upon Defendant's Bank of the West account for a total of $67,769.56, as of 02/13/09, and Defendant shall continue to perform its obligation under the collective bargaining agreement, re 64 Motion to Enforce Judgment. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 4/9/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2009) Modified on 4/10/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
March 30, 2009 72 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 64 Motion to Enforce Judgment (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2009)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Distributors Association Warehousemen's Pension Trust et al v. Foreign Trade Zone 3, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?