Jaffe v. Kramer
| 3:2005cv04439 |
| November 1, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Martin J. Jenkins |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/21/2015. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2015)
|
|
Filing
95
Order by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion to Dismiss.(pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2014)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER Vacating Deadlines, ***Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/20/2013. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Answer due by 1/7/2014. Response/opposition due by 2/6/2014. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/8/2013. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER by Judge Hamilton dismissing unexhausted claim andgranting 68 Motion to Stay (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
67
BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 6/20/12. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jaffe v. Kramer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
