Leuzinger v. County of Lake
4:2006cv00398 |
January 20, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Saundra Brown Armstrong |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 262 STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the Judgment entered on 10/31/07 has been fully satisfied, re 117 Judgment. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 2/16/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2010) Modified on 2/18/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 259 ORDER re Distributions to be made from the Leuzinger Section 468B Trust re 257 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 9/9/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2009) Modified on 9/11/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 253 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting in part and denying in part 173 Motion for Attorney Fees (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2009) |
Filing 251 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 241 Motion to Deposit Funds; granting 248 Motion for Writ (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2009) |
Filing 171 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting in part and denying in part 150 Motion for Taxation of Costs. Costs taxed in the amount of $ $24,324.54 against DEFENDANT. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Leuzinger v. County of Lake | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.