Lal et al v. State Of California et al
3:2006cv05158 |
August 23, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Phyllis J. Hamilton |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 1/10/2012. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012) |
Filing 87 ORDER by Judge Hamilton Granting 71 Motion for Summary Judgment (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012) |
Filing 86 ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re 85 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Shelly Lal. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/6/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011) |
Filing 50 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/18/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2011) |
Filing 47 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REMANDED CASE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/6/2011. Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/22/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lal et al v. State Of California et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.