Kinstley et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
| Maria Lee Kinstley and Kenneth R. Kinstley |
| City and County of San Francisco and Dianne Kenney |
| 4:2007cv02323 |
| January 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Maria-Elena James |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
179
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 178 Motion to Continue (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2010)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 163 Motion to Seal Declaration (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2010) Modified on 1/22/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 129 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply. Defendant's Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 07/17/09. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/17/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2009) Modified on 7/20/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 7/20/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 117 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff shall file opposition to motion to strike within (5) five-days of this Order; Defendant may file reply within (3) three-days of service of Plaintiff's opposition (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2009) Modified on 7/9/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
100
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY: Such that the new dates are as follows: Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff: 03/03/09 2009; Designation of Experts: 05/04/09; Expert Disclosures: 05/26/09; Expert Discovery Cutoff: 06/09/09. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 3/16/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2009) Modified on 3/17/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
97
AMENDED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James re 68 MOTION for sanctions See Docket 95 Order on Motion to Compel); ORDER DENYING 90 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 91 Motion for Sanctions; FINDING AS MOOT 92 Motion to Strike (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2009) Modified on 2/18/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
89
STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the City of Pleasant Hill is dismissed from this action with prejudice. Each party to bear their own fees and costs with regard to this dismissed Defendant. City of Pleasant Hill terminated. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 1/29/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2009) Modified on 2/2/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 77 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. The hearing on the motion set for 01/30/09 at 1:00 PM, is VACATED (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2009) Modified on 1/26/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, DENYING AS MOOT 52 , 63 Motions to Stay and DENYING AS MOOT 54 Motion to Strike (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2009) Modified on 1/20/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, DENYING 76 Motion to Stay (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2008) Modified on 12/23/2008 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE re 66 Letter filed by Dianne Kenney. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/13/2008. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
