Palo Mobile Estates Associates v. City of East Palo Alto
Palo Mobile Estates Associates |
City of East Palo Alto |
3:2007cv03601 |
July 12, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Mateo |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STARTING TIME OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/15/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2010) |
Filing 52 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 51 Stipulation filed by City of East Palo Alto. Case Management Conference set for 8/26/2010 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/25/2010. (vlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2010) |
Filing 49 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 48 Stipulation filed by Palo Mobile Estates Associates. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/24/2010. Case Management Conference set for 7/1/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/28/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2010) |
Filing 46 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 44 Stipulation filed by Palo Mobile Estates Associates. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/1/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010) |
Filing 42 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 41 Stipulation filed by City of East Palo Alto. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/27/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2009) |
Filing 40 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 39 Stipulation filed by Palo Mobile Estates Associates. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/11/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2009) |
Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 36 Stipulation filed by Palo Mobile Estates Associates. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/30/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2008) |
Filing 35 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 34 Stipulation filed by Palo Mobile Estates Associates. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/28/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2008) |
Filing 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 32 Stipulation filed by Palo Mobile Estates Associates. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/12/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Palo Mobile Estates Associates v. City of East Palo Alto | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Palo Mobile Estates Associates | |
Represented By: | Yen Ngoc Nguyen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of East Palo Alto | |
Represented By: | Michael S. Lawson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.