Jones v. Evans et al
| Malik Jones |
| Mike Evans, L. Washington, D. Lang, E. Contrazs, Martines and Bailey |
| 4:2007cv04277 |
| August 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Lassen |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING 101 , 102 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2011)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER Granting 85 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/31/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2011)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COURTESY COPIES OF DEFENDANT BAILEY'S DISPOSITIVE MOTION; AND GRANTING 92 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2011)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER by Judge Claudia WilkenGRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 90 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT BAILEY'S DISPOSITIVE MOTION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2011)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER OF SERVICE AND ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS by Judge Claudia Wilken denying 7 Motion for TRO; denying 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 10 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 12 Motion for Default Judgment (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
