Habte v. Westin St. Francis Hotel
Plaintiff: Abraham Habte
Defendant: Westin St. Francis Hotel
Case Number: 4:2007cv04516
Filed: August 31, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Wayne D. Brazil
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 17 NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE of Settlement Conference AND ORDER - Settlement Conference continued 3/27/2008 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 2/1/08. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of service)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2008) Modified on 2/4/2008 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Habte v. Westin St. Francis Hotel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abraham Habte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Westin St. Francis Hotel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?