Krzyzanowsky et al v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. et al
| Ronald Krzyzanowsky, Ileana Krzyzanowsky and Donna Burmann |
| Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. and Rollins, Inc. |
| 4:2007cv05362 |
| November 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
202
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. All scheduled dates are VACATED. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 12/24/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2009) Modified on 1/4/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER by Judge Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 195 Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Class Certification. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2009) Modified on 12/3/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 12/3/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING IN ITS ENTIRETY 172 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2009) Modified on 11/23/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
193
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 185 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying 185 Ex Parte Application ; denying 192 Ex Parte Application (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2009)
|
|
Filing
147
STIPULATION AND ORDER: That Defendants response to first amended complaint is due 04/20/09; should plaintiffs file a second amended complaint on or before 04/20/09, then defendants' will not be required to respond to the first amended complaint. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 4/17/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2009) Modified on 4/21/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 12/22/09at 9:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman, on 4/7/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2009) Modified on 4/8/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
140
STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint is EXTENDED to 04/15/09, re 136 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 4/3/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2009) Modified on 4/7/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 84 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff to file Amended Complaint Within (20) twenty-days from the date of this Order (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009) Modified on 2/25/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER RE OVERDUE PAPERS: That if a Settlement Conference Statement is not lodged by noon tomorrow, Plaintiffs and Defendants and their attorney(s) of record will be sanctioned $100 a day for each days delay, beginning from the date it was originally due. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 2/12/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2009) Modified on 2/13/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
88
STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the briefing schedule re defendants' motion addressing plaintiffs' standing be VACATED. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 12/8/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2008) Modified on 12/9/2008 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 67 Motion to Continue (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2008)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER RE: VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL LOCAL RULES. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 9/17/08. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
