Crosthwaite et al v. Burkhart et al
| Gil Crosthwaite, Russ Burns, Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Operating Engineers and Participating Employer Pre-Apprenticeship, Apprentice and Journeymen Affirmative Action Training Fund, Operating Engineers Vacation and Holiday Plan, Operating Engineers Contract Administration Trust Fund, Operating Engineers Market Preservation Trust Fund, Operating Engineers Industry Stabilization Trust Fund, Business Development Trust Fund and Heavy and Highway Committee |
| David G. Burkhart, Glenn Ellis Burkhart and Bradley Construction Inc. |
| 4:2008cv01271 |
| March 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
WRIT of execution issued in the amount of $134,067.57 as to Bradley Construction Inc, David Glen Burkhart, Glenn Ellis Burkhart re 31 (cp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
26
AMENDED WRIT of execution issued in the amount of $98,523.95 as Bradley Construction Inc, David Glenn Burkhart, Glenn Ellis Burkhart (cp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
