HDI-Gerling America Insurance Company v. Homestead Insurance Company et al
HDI-Gerling America Insurance Company |
Homestead Insurance Company and Great American E&S Insurance Company |
3:2008cv01716 |
March 31, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Insurance Office |
Los Angeles |
Phyllis J. Hamilton |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 47 Stipulation filed by Gerling America Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/26/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2009) |
Filing 45 ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/30/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2009) |
Filing 44 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 43 Proposed Order filed by Gerling America Insurance Company, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/1/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2008) |
Filing 40 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT re 39 Stipulation filed by HDI-Gerling America Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/22/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2008) |
Filing 38 STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/26/2008. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.