Wright v. Hedgpeth et al
| Michael J. Wright |
| A. Hedgpeth and J. Tilton |
| 4:2008cv02228 |
| April 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Kern |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 37 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2011)
|
|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/15/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2010)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 21 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Respondent's Answer due 12/04/09. Petitioner's Traverse due within (30) thirty-days of receipt of Answer (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2009) Modified on 10/23/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER LIFTING STAY AND REOPENING CASE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 15 Motion for Removal and Transfer, DENYING 16 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 8/6/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2009) Modified on 8/11/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 8/11/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 7 Motion extension of time (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
