Singh et al v. Chertoff et al
| Sukhwinder Singh and Dharam Singh |
| Michael Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security, Lynne Skeirik, Michael S. Owen and Condoleezza Rice |
| 4:2008cv02362 |
| May 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER FOLLOWING REMAND. Signed by Judge Beeler on 10/14/10. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER and Memorandum Opinion granting 20 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment by Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil. (wdblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2009) Modified on 3/12/2009 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Approving re 18 Stipulation, filed by Sukhwinder Singh, Lynne Skeirik, Michael Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security, Dharam Singh, Michael S. Owen, Condoleezza Rice. Signed by Judge Brazil on 1/26/09. (wdblc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2009)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Wayne D. Brazil on 12/2/2008. (wdblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2008)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting request for exemption of ADR process. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/8/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2008) Modified on 9/29/2008 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
