Jurik et al v. Arps
Mark Jurik |
Jan Arps and Jan Arps' Traders Toolbox LLC |
4:2008cv05030 |
November 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Copyright Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Claudia Wilken |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
17:101 Copyright Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER re 42 granting STIPULATION of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/25/10. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2010) |
Filing 40 ORDER APPROVING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT MEDIATION BY PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Laporte on 11/17/09. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2009) |
Filing 39 ORDER APPROVING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Laporte on 11/16/09. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2009) |
Filing 30 ORDER re 24 GRANTING STIPULATION selecting Mediation. Case referred to mediation.. Signed by Judge CLAUDIA WILKEN on 5/21/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2009) |
Filing 10 ORDER FINDING CASES NOT RELATED re 8 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases. The Court does NOT find that 08-cv-05030-CW Jurik et al v. Arps is related to 98-cv-20023-JW Jurik et al v. Dowling et al. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/9/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2009) |
Filing 8 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re C-98-20023 JW. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/24/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.