Kunamneni v. Gutierrez
Plaintiff: Hari P. Kunamneni
Defendant: Carlos M. Gutierrez
Case Number: 3:2008cv05154
Filed: November 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Phyllis J. Hamilton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER by Judge Hamilton Granting 24 Motion to Change Venue. (pjhlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2009)
April 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge Hamilton Denying 23 Motion for Administrative Relief. (pjhlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kunamneni v. Gutierrez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hari P. Kunamneni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carlos M. Gutierrez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?