Boyd v. Global Vision Products, Inc. et al
| Garrett Boyd |
| Global Vision Products, Inc., Anthony Imbriolo, Derrike Cope, David L. Gordon, Powertel Technologies, Inc., Craig Dix, Henry Edelson and Robert DeBenedicitis |
| 4:2008cv05581 |
| December 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
| Alameda |
| Wayne D. Brazil |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER Directing Clerk to Close File and Remand Action to State Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil on 3/23/09. (wdblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2009)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil terminating 5 Motion to Shorten Time; granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Remand. (wdblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2009) Modified on 3/23/2009 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER re 32 Stipulation Re: Meet and Confer and ADR Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil on 3/4/2009. (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2009) Modified on 3/5/2009 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER SEVERING AND PARTIALLY REMANDING PURSUANT TO STIPULATION re 21 Stipulation filed by James Thomas. Signed by Judge Brazil on 2/02/09. (wdblc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
