Newport Builders, Inc. v. North Bay Construction, Inc.
| Newport Builders, Inc. |
| North Bay Construction, Inc. |
| 4:2009cv00184 |
| January 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Contract: Other Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/18/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2010)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 93 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaim. Defendant shall Electronically File its Amended Answer and Counterclaims within (5) five-days of this Order. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2010) Modified on 2/26/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
113
AMENDED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James DENYING 79 Motion for Attorney Fees (amended to add signature). Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, on 2/23/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2010) Modified on 2/25/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 79 Motion for Attorney Fees (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
92
NOTICE OF REFERENCE re 88 Order Referring Motion,. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/19/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2009)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 80 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Counterclaim. Plaintiff's Response due 11/19/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2009) Modified on 10/29/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 58 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; Plaintiff is required to E-FILE the Second Amended Complaint within (5) five-days of this Order. The motion hearing set for 12/01/09 is VACATED. The Telephonic Case Management Conference is ADVANCED to 10/28/09 at 3:15 PM. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2009) Modified on 9/28/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 55 Motion to Strike, DENYING 31 Motion to Strike. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2009) Modified on 7/15/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 61 Ex Parte Motion to Continue Hearing on Motion to Strike (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2009) Modified on 7/1/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Newport Builders, Inc. v. North Bay Construction, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Newport Builders, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph William Klobas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: North Bay Construction, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
