Lake et al v. First National Insurance Company of America
| James Bryan Lake and Terry Hall |
| First National Insurance Company of America |
| 4:2009cv00797 |
| February 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Insurance Office |
| Alameda |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 66 Motion for Reconsideration (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2011)
|
|
Filing
65
JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/16/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2010)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER GRANTING 49 Ex Parte MOTION for Hearing Hearing Date filed by First National Insurance Company of America, Set/Reset Deadlines as to Hearing Date, 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment., Motions terminated: 49 Ex Parte MOTION for Hearing Hearing Date filed by First National Insurance Company of America. Responses due by 10/19/2010. Replies due by 11/2/2010. Motion Hearing set for 11/16/2010 01:00 PM.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/5/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2010)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 22 Motion for Summary Judgment (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2010) Modified on 6/22/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
