Permar v. Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
Plaintiff: Clark Permar
Defendant: Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
Cross-claimant: Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
Cross-defendant: Clark Permar
Case Number: 4:2009cv00972
Filed: March 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 70 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Dismissing Case (FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii) filed by Spectra Watermakers, Inc., Clark Permar. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/17/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)
November 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER RE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/2/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)
November 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR MAGISTRATE TO RESOLVE DISPUTE RE: TERMS OF SETTLEMENT re 61 Stipulation, filed by Spectra Watermakers, Inc., Clark Permar. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/30/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010)
May 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER re 61 Stipulation, filed by Spectra Watermakers, Inc., Clark Permar Hearing set for 6/3/2010 10:30 AM in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Chief Magistrate Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 5/21/10. (bjt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2010)
April 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/21/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2010)
September 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/14/2009 at 04:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 9/28/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2009) Modified on 9/29/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
July 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Early Neutral Evaluation. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/16/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Permar v. Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clark Permar
Represented By: Jack Siedman, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
Represented By: Michael E. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross-claimant: Spectra Watermakers, Inc.
Represented By: Michael E. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross-defendant: Clark Permar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?