Momento, Inc v. Seccion Amarilla USA et al
| Momento, Inc |
| Seccion Amarilla USA, Cory Suazo and Rafael Berrios |
| 4:2009cv01223 |
| March 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Copyright Office |
| Alameda |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 17:501 Copyright Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 11/30/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2009) Modified on 12/3/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
111
NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 09/29/09. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2009)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 76 Motion to Dismiss Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2009) Modified on 9/18/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/31/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2009)
|
|
Filing
94
AMENDED ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Defendants. Defendants shall retrieve all of the 2009 San Jose Directories; Defendants shall turnover to Plaintiff's counsel all p rimary infringing articles used for solicitation of advertisements; The preliminary injunction will take effect upon Momento's posting of bond in the amount of $355,550. The bond shall be posted on or before 4:00 PM on 07/13/09. Plaintiff&# 039;s Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply Brief and Supplemental Declaration to Reply Brief in Support of Ex Parte Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 7/6/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2009) Modified on 7/10/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER: That the hearing scheduled for 06/16/09 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 5/27/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2009) Modified on 5/29/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, DENYING AS MOOT 60 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply Brief and Supplemental Declaration to Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application and GRANTING Plaintiff's Mo tion for Preliminary Injunction against Defendants. The Preliminary Injunction takes effect upon Momentos posting a bond in the amount of $355,550.00. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2009) Modified on 5/15/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 5/15/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
48
STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/8/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2009)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, GRANTING 26 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion. Seccion Amarilla USA shall file its opposition no later than 04/03/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2009) Modified on 4/2/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
19
AMENDED ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, DENYING 2 Ex Parte Motion for Order for Impound or in the Alternative Order to Preserve Evidence, Temporary Restraining Order, Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/24/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2009) Modified on 3/25/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
