Rosal v. First Federal Bank of California et al
| Jeffrey D. Rosal |
| First Federal Bank of California, Seaside Financial Corporation, T.D. Service Company, Servicelink and All Phase Brokers Inc |
| 3:2009cv01276 |
| March 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Real Property: Other Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1601 Truth in Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Hamilton on July 15, 2009. (pjhlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2009)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 62 Stipulation, filed by Jeffrey D. Rosal, Seaside Financial Corporation, Servicelink, All Phase Brokers Inc, First Federal Bank of California, T.D. Service Company. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/6/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2009)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER by Judge Hamilton Denying 20 Second Ex Parte Motion for TRO. (pjhlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2009)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/31/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2009)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER by Judge Hamilton Denying 4 Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction; And Ordering Hearing and Briefing for Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (pjhlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
