Gregory v. City and County of San Francisco et al
| Kenneth M. Gregory |
| City and County of San Francisco and San Francisco General Hospital |
| 3:2009cv01800 |
| April 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 12/20/2010. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER by Judge Hamilton Granting 56 Motion for Extension of Time (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2010)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Compel (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER RE FILING RECORD OF MEET AND CONFER SESSION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 8/12/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2010)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Rule 56(f) Motion for Continuance. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 8/6/2010. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
46
NOTICE and ORDER Continuing Hearing Date. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 7/26/2010. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2010)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Hamilton Granting 23 Request to Extend Discovery Deadline (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
