Woodard v. City of Menlo Park
| Robert Lee Woodward |
| City of Menlo Park |
| 4:2009cv03331 |
| July 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Mateo |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
214
ORDER Granting 213 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 1/31/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2014)
|
|
Filing
212
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 2/5/2014 03:00 PM. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 1/16/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2014)
|
|
Filing
209
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 1/15/2014. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2014 02:45 PM. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 11/7/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
206
ORDER VACATING 177 JUDGMENT AND REFERRING MATTER FOR MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 10/15/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 195 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
185
ORDER re 184 to Extend Deadlines to File Responsive Briefs to 181 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(b) and, in the alternative, Motion for New Trial Under Rule 59, filed by Robert Lee Woodard, Ron Venzon, S et/Reset Deadlines as to 184 to Extend Deadlines to File Responsive Briefs to 181 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(b) and, in the alternative, Motion for New Trial Under Rule 59, , 181 Renewed MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(b) and, in the alternative, MOTION for New Trial Under Rule 59., Motions terminated: 184 to Extend Deadlines to File Responsive Briefs to 181 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under R ule 50(b) and, in the alternative, Motion for New Trial Under Rule 59, filed by Robert Lee Woodard, Ron Venzon. Responses due by 12/7/2012. Replies due by 1/4/2013.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/19/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2012)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting in part and denying in part 142 Motion in Limine; granting 147 Motion USE LEADING QUESTIONS (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
161
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 151 Motion DISMISS CITY OF MENLO PARK (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2012)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER PERMITTING EQUIPMENT AT TRIAL Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/17/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2012)
|
|
Filing
144
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 139 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Exclusion of Evidence filed by Robert Lee Woodard, Ron Venzon, Motions terminated: 139 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Exclusion of Evidence filed by Robert Lee Woodard, Ron Venzon.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/14/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2012)
|
|
Filing
95
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/1/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
|
|
Filing
89
STIPULATION AND ORDER, Motions terminated: 88 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery filed by Robert Lee Woodard, Ron Venzon.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/9/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 78 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL: That Kristin M. Hall and Peter C. Meier of Paul Hastings LLP has been appointed to represent Plaintiff Robert Woodard in this matter. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 05/17/12. (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2012)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2011)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 22 Motion to Dismiss. The Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to 04/21/2010 at 3:30 PM. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2010) Modified on 3/9/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER, GRANTING 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Menlo Park. GRANTING Plaintiff Leave to Amend Complaint. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/14/2010 at 03:15 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/10/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2009) Modified on 11/17/2009 (kc, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodard v. City of Menlo Park | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Lee Woodward | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Menlo Park | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
