Green v. Eastmont Oakland Associates, LLC. et al
Cheryl Green |
Eastmont Oakland Associates, LLC., Scanlankemperbard Companies and Bank of America, NA |
4:2009cv03682 |
August 12, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Saundra Brown Armstrong |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/10/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2011) |
Filing 38 CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 12/20/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2010) |
Filing 35 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 32 Motion FOR RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56 (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2010) |
Filing 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to 11/4/2010 02:30 PM., via Telephone. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 7/20/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2010) Modified on 7/22/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Proposed Order, filed by Scanlankemperbard Companies, Cheryl Green, Bank of America, NA, Eastmont Oakland Associates, LLC.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/23/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2010) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 6/2/2010 02:45 PM.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/3/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.