Banga v. First USA, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Kamlesh Banga
Defendant: First USA, N.A. and Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Case Number: 4:2010cv00975
Filed: March 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 194 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong DENYING 187 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2014)
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 159 Ex Parte Application (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013)
October 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 142 Motion To Modify 141 Order Granting Chase Bank, USA, N.A.'s Request To File Confidential Documents Lodged With This Court Under Seal re 138 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2013)
October 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 138 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)
June 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG terminating 123 Motion to Compel; terminating 124 Motion to Strike 124 MOTION to Strike 120 Amended Complaint , 123 MOTION to Compel MOTION for Entry of Default, 120 Amended Complaint (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 77 Motion for Extension of Time to File (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2012)
March 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 31 Motion to Stay; adopting Report and Recommendations as to 59 Report and Recommendations. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2011)
November 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RULE 41(D) COSTS. Signed by Judge Beeler on 11/22/10. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010)
September 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/28/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2010)
June 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 36 Motion REFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECTREFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT; denying 38 Motion REFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECTREFERRAL TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2010)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Banga v. First USA, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kamlesh Banga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First USA, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Represented By: Wendy Chai Krog
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?