Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Zuniga et al
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
Cynthia Zuniga, M. Zuniga, III and Susan Snyder |
4:2010cv02309 |
May 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
Saundra Brown Armstrong |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 53 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Susan Snyder Gerros, M. Zuniga, III, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Cynthia Zuniga. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/7/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2012) |
Filing 51 ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/30/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011) |
Filing 47 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE re 46 Notice (Other) filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/15/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2011) |
Filing 36 ORDER RE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DEPOSIT FUNDS WITH THE COURT AND DISCHARGE AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEE COSTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/17/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011) |
Filing 10 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 8 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.